Stacked merchant cash advances and the remittance ratio
What stacking is, why each new advance makes the last one harder to pay, and the one number that measures the pressure: remittances as a share of revenue.
Published
A merchant cash advance is sold as a purchase of a slice of your future sales, not as a loan. You get a lump sum now and remit a fixed daily or weekly amount, or a percentage of card sales, until a larger payback figure is reached. The cost is set by a factor rate rather than an interest rate, which is why two advances that look similar on paper can cost very different amounts once you work out how fast you are paying them back.
What stacking is
Stacking is taking a second advance while the first is still being paid, then a third while the first two are still being paid. Each funder files its own paperwork, each pulls its own remittance from the same bank account, and none of them reduces its draw because another funder arrived. The new money usually goes toward the old remittances, so the business ends up borrowing from one funder to pay another.
Most advance agreements say you may not take another advance without the funder’s consent. Breaking that term is often treated as a default, which can trigger the enforcement rights in the agreement: a letter to your customers telling them to pay the funder directly under UCC § 9-406, a demand on the personal promise to pay that most owners sign, or in some states a confession of judgment. New York barred filing confessions of judgment against people who do not live there in 2019 (CPLR § 3218), but older agreements and other venues still appear.
Why the second advance is more dangerous than the first
- The draws add up, the revenue does not. Each advance is sized against your gross deposits as they stood when it was taken. The funder of the third advance saw bank statements already carrying two daily debits and sized its draw on top of them.
- Factor-rate cost compounds through speed. A 1.3 factor on a six-month payback is the same dollar cost as a 1.3 factor on a twelve-month payback, but the annualized rate is roughly double. Stacked advances tend to come with shorter terms, so the blended annual cost climbs with every layer.
- Default clauses cross-trigger. A missed debit on one advance can be a default on all of them, because each agreement counts another funder’s enforcement as an event of default.
One number: the remittance ratio
The remittance-to-revenue ratio is the share of a month’s gross revenue that goes out as advance remittances. It is the first figure a restructuring professional asks for, because it says whether the business can still fund its own operations.
To calculate it, convert every remittance to a monthly figure and add them up: a daily debit times 21 business days, a weekly debit times 4.33. Divide by average monthly gross revenue from your bank statements, not from projections. Levraq reads the result with a plain rule: under 10% is stable, 10% or more is strained, and 25% or more is critical, because at a quarter of revenue the remaining cash rarely covers payroll, rent and suppliers. The remittance ratio calculator does the arithmetic.
Two things make the ratio worse than it looks. First, it is computed on gross revenue, but your margin is what actually pays the bills; a 20% ratio on a business with 30% gross margin leaves a third of the margin. Second, the ratio lags: a month with a sales dip sends the ratio up immediately, while the fixed daily debit does not move.
What the disclosure laws tell you
Several states now require sales-based financing offers below a dollar threshold to carry standardized cost disclosures, including an estimated annual percentage rate or total dollar cost: New York under Financial Services Law Article 8, California under the DFPI’s commercial financing disclosure rules, Virginia under Title 6.2, Chapter 22.1, and Utah under its Commercial Financing Registration and Disclosure Act. If you have those disclosure sheets, the annual rate on each is the quickest way to rank your advances from most to least expensive. If you were never given one and your state requires it, that is worth mentioning to whoever advises you.
The Federal Reserve Banks’ Small Business Credit Survey tracks how many employer firms apply for merchant cash advances each year and how often they are approved; it is the closest thing to a public baseline for how common this product has become.
What to do this week
- List every open advance: funder, start date, payback figure, remaining balance, daily or weekly debit.
- Pull three months of bank statements and compute the ratio from actual deposits and actual debits.
- Check whether your state’s filing office shows a UCC-1 for each funder; the UCC-1 guide explains how.
- Do not take a fourth advance to cover the third. Once the ratio is above 25%, the arithmetic does not improve with more layers.
The free Debt Check asks for the same inputs, computes the ratio, counts the stack, pulls the public UCC filings naming MCA funders for your business, and writes out which rule put you in the Stable, Strained or Critical tier. It is a diagnostic, not advice, and it makes no promise about the outcome.
Sources
- UCC § 9-406, discharge of account debtor after notification (Cornell LII)
- UCC § 9-102, definitions including “account” and “account debtor” (Cornell LII)
- New York Financial Services Law Article 8, commercial financing disclosures
- California DFPI, California Financing Law: commercial financing disclosures
- Code of Virginia Title 6.2, Chapter 22.1, sales-based financing providers and brokers
- Utah Code Title 7, Chapter 27, Commercial Financing Registration and Disclosure Act
- New York CPLR § 3218, judgment by confession
- Federal Reserve Banks, 2024 Small Business Credit Survey: Report on Employer Firms



